Not Impressed



I tried to refrain from blogging about the Sex and the City Movie filming going on at the moment because I hate the idea of a second movie. But then I saw the above image, which is beyond terrible. There are three possibilities for this look, they are:

A) There will be a flashback of Carrie from the 1980's. This idea sucks because however wonderful SJP is she doesn't look 20, not one bit, therefore it will look stupid. And they never did flashbacks in the show, mainly because the show wasn't cheesy.

B) This is how Carrie copes with the recession. If this is the case they may as well stop filming now.

C) This is a distraction technique used by the crew to make us think one of the above points. If so maybe they should stop wasting time and work on making a decent film - one with no corny or clichéd flashbacks from the past.

At least she later looked pretty in a nice purple dress.



I have to ask, does anyone actually care what happens next to Carrie, Sam, Charlotte and Miranda? I love the show soooo much but I really think enough is enough.

images from thefashionspot

I Never Knew Lanvin Could Look Bad


Sandra Bullock in Lanvin

God it's bad! I love Lanvin. I thought it would make everyone look amazing, that its beauty could never be messed up. I was wrong.

At school I had a teacher who always used to say Sandra Bullock had 'an ugly vibe'. I disagreed, I actually like Sandra a lot. But why did she have to ruin this dress? Why did she have to pass on the 'ugly vibe'?

Without the boots it would look better, but it would still be wrong. The only thing that will make this OK is if Ashley Olsen, Diane Kruger and Lake Bell all wear Lanvin tomorrow.

image from justjared.buzznet.com

Are People Mad?

This morning I posted a gorgeous editorial from my ex-favourite magazine, American Harper's Bazaar. I am now about to bitch about their September issue. Normally I would hate to be so critical but I'm in a bad mood and I think you will all agree with what I am saying anyway.

Leighton Meester is on the cover. I had heard it would be Ashley Olsen and I am now relived it wasn't, because what they did to poor Leighton is terrible. She is supposed to be looking 'fabulous at every age' and they have photoshopped her to make her look older. Leighton looks fabulous at the age she is now (23), why not leave her that age and choose a fabulous 60-year-old to shoot as well as her?

The pictures of her looking older are just funny - click them to see larger size. Plus the clothes suck. I thought Anna Wintour was a bit OTT to ban black at Vogue, but now I get her point, these pictures filled with black clothes are so flat. Black clothes, white wall, fake old lady.... Why did they think this would work?
Even when Leighton was looking young the styling is still beyond boring. She is super pretty girl and there are tons of great new designers out there they could have styled her in instead of a office appropriate simple black dress.


In under seven minutes I managed to find clothes at Browns Focus that would have been much more fun to see Leighton wearing - even if it was just for her 'young' years.


ALL CLOTHES FROM BROWNSFASHION.COM
And to make matters worse there is a Susan Boyle editorial in this issue too. Her makeover is actually very good though, she looks younger than Leighton at least...

What happened to the Harper's that produced stunning images like this? I miss it.

And what do you think of Leighton's editorial? Boring or do you like it? I'm looking forward to your comments on this topic...

images from the fashion spot

Glamour Model and the City?

I never wanted a Sex and the City movie, but like a dedicated fan I stuck with it and saw it twice. It wasn't terrible but it wasn't great either, not even half as good as it was on TV. The fact that they're making a second movie makes me really angry - it originally ended perfectly, we don't need anymore.

But nothing prepared me for the rumours that Katie Price aka Jordan is planning to audition for the sequel. A source told Grazia 'It is not 100% confirmed, but the part she is auditioning for is rumoured to be a sexy British nanny, potentially for Big and Carrie who are said to be moving to Britain as part of the story line.'

Yippee. Not.

Not only will the storyline revolve around Carrie changing nappies but we'll have to watch an ex glamour model trying to act. This is one rumour that better not have an inch of truth to it.

Do you think they need to make another film? And do you want Carrie to have a baby?